Please enjoy this book trailer for The Gypsy’s Curse. For more information on the book, or to reserve your copy, go here.
The Gazette
18th Century Kitchen: A look inside Hannah Glasse’s 1765 cookbook

While working on the Adam Fletcher Adventure Series cookbook, I’m doing a good bit of research in cookbooks that were actually in use in the mid-to-late 18th century.
Below is a transcription of the cover page for one of the most famous “receipt” (recipe) books of the era, Hannah Glasse’s The Art of Cookery Made Plain and Easy. If you’d like to see the entire book for free as a PDF, click here.
The Art of Cookery was first published in 1747 and went through 20 different editions. It continued to be published until 1843 and was popular in England and America.
Art of Cookery
Made
PLAIN and EASY
Which far exceeds any Thing of the Kind yet published
CONTAINING
- How to Roast and Boil to Perfection every Thing necessary to be sent up to Table
- Of Made-dishes
- How expensive a French Cook’s Sauce is
- To make a Number of pretty little Dishes for a Supper or Side-dish, and little Corner-dishes for a great Table.
- To dress Fish
- Of Soops and Broths
- Of Puddings
- Of Pies
- For a Lent Dinner; a Number of good Dishes, which you may make use of at any other Time
- Directions to prepare proper Food for the Sick
- For Captains of Ships; how to make all useful Things for a Voyage; and setting out a Table on board a Ship.
- Of Hogs Puddings, Sausages, &c.
- To pot and make Hams, &c.
- Of Pickling.
- Of making Cakes, &c.
- Of Cheese-cakes, Creams, Jellies, Whip-Syllabubs, &c.
- Of made Wines, Brewing, French Bread, Muffins, &c.
- Jarring Cherries and Preserves, &c.
- To make Anchovies, Vermicella, Catchup, Vinegar, and to keep Artichokes, French Beans, &c.
- Of Distilling
- How to Market; the Seasons of the Year for Butchers Meat, Poultry, Fish, Herbs, Roots, and Fruit.
- A certain Cure for the Bite of a Mad-Dog. By Dr. Mead.
- A Receipt to keep clear from Buggs.
To which are added,
By Way of APPENDIX,
One hundred and fifty New and Useful Receips,
And a Copious Index.
By a LADY
The Ninth Edition
LONDON:
Printed for A. Millar, J. and R. Tonson, W. Strahan, T. Caslon, T. Durham, and W. Nicoll.
M.DCC.LXV.
[Price bound Five Shillings.]
The Spanish Invasion of Beaufort: How slaves turned settlers became pawns in Spain’s hand

On Adam Fletcher’s first day as an apprentice (in The Smuggler’s Gambit), he is placed under the instruction of Boaz Brooks, senior cooper and second-in-charge at the shipping company. Adam learns that Boaz was also forced into an apprenticeship when he was younger. As they share their personal histories, one of the topics that arises is the 1747 Spanish invasion of Beaufort. In book 2, Captured in the Caribbean
, more information comes out about that frightening event.
Although the event isn’t explored in depth in the novel, it was a very real part of Beaufort history. To date, however, no one has really explored the subject of who exactly those Spaniards were who took the town.
That is, until now.
What we already know
In the Preface to Volume 22 of the State Records of North Carolina, we are told that Spaniards invaded the coast in three different locations spanning a period of nearly a decade. The first instance occurred in 1741 near Ocracoke Inlet. The final instance occurred along the Cape Fear when Spaniards invaded Brunswick in 1748. The Beaufort invasion, however, took place in 1747 and is summarized in this way:
In June, 1747, the Spaniards took possession of the town and harbor of Beaufort, and Colonel Thomas Lovick called out his regiment to repel them. Major Enoch Ward was on duty with fifty-eight men when the town was taken on 26 August, and the alarm continued until 10 September, although probably the Spaniards departed earlier. On 6 September William Moore brought in his bill against the public for fifteen hundred pounds of beef for maintaining and imprisoning ten Spanish negroes, and for a gun which had burst in time of action which he said cost him eighty pounds. These Spanish vessels were largely manned by negroes and mulattoes.
At the bottom of this article, there is a list of the brave Beaufort citizens who banded together to fight off these Spanish marauders and restore peace and tranquility to the otherwise quiet seaport town.
Who were these Spanish “negroes and mulattoes” and what did they want?
In The Colonial Records of North Carolina, Volume 4, we are given a bit more information about these men:
In 1747, several small sloops and barcalonjos crept along the coast from St. Augustine, full of armed men, mostly mulattoes and negroes, their small draught securing them from the attacks of the only ship of war then on our coast. They landed at Ocacock, Core Sound, Bear Inlet and Cape Fear, where they killed several people, burned some ships and small vessels, carried off some negroes and slaughtered a great number of cattle and hogs. These practices continued all the summer of 1747, and led to the erection of several forts along the coast, one of which, Fort Johnston, still survives.
Why would “negroes and mulattoes” have “carried off some negroes”?
I can think of a few reasons, but perhaps if we learn who these black Spaniards from St. Augustine were we can better ascertain why they would’ve been interested in taking local “negroes” with them.
Fort Mose ” The Spaniard’s Gambit?
Established in 1738 as the first free black settlement in what would eventually become the United States, Gracia Real de Santa Teresa de Mose, or “Fort Mose” (pronounced Moh-say) for short, was located just outside St. Augustine, Florida. It was created as a Spanish sanctuary of sorts for runaway slaves from the Carolinas. They were welcome to stay in the settlement as free men and women provided they would convert to Catholicism and pledge their allegiance to the King of Spain.
It should be pointed out that their allegiance meant that their position just north of St. Augustine demanded the residents of Fort Mose act as the northern defense for America’s oldest city, a challenging position considering Spain’s enemies to the north were the English.
Just two years later, in 1740, their allegiance was put to the test when British forces came from Georgia, led by James Oglethorpe, with the intention of taking over the fort. Spanish troops, along with local Indians and the free black militia counterattacked and ran the British troops out, but destroyed the original fort in the process. For a time, the residents of Fort Mose relocated to St. Augustine and lived among the Spanish there, but it wasn’t to last.
In his book, Many Thousands Gone: The First Two Centuries of Slavery in North America, historian Ira Berlin writes:
Declaring themselves “vassals of the King and deserving of royal protection,” they continually put themselves in the forefront of service to the Crown with the expectations that the Crown would reciprocate.
Hoped-for rewards were not always forthcoming. All “vassals of the King” were not equally favored. Beginning in 1749, a new governor of Florida forced black people to return to Mose, much against their will, as they had enjoyed the cosmopolitan life of St. Augustine, where their ability to converse in several European, Indian, and African languages gave them a place as cultural brokers in a multicultural society.
Make no mistake about it, mercy and compassion are not what prompted the Spanish government to welcome fugitive slaves into the Florida colony. It was a strategic decision. What better way to destabilize the fledgling English colonies to the north than to entice their labor force”albeit their slave labor force”to run south? And then, on top of that, they expected those slaves-turned-settlers to take up arms against any threats to Spain and her territories.
Maybe even return to the colonies from whence they came to take their countrymen and exact a bit of revenge?
Why was Beaufort a target?
As it said earlier in this article, the attack on Beaufort was one of a series of attacks on the coast of North Carolina by Spaniards. Again, it was strategic. According to historian Charles L. Paul, the population of taxables in Carteret County in 1748, the year after the invasion, was only 320, while the taxables for the town of Beaufort was only one-tenth of that number, or just 32. (In North Carolina, taxables, or tithables, were defined as follows, “¦every white Person Male of the age of Sixteen Years and upwards all Negroes Mulattoes Mustees Male or female and all Persons of Mixt Blood to the fourth Generation Male and Female of the age of twelve years and upwards, and no other Persons whatsoever, shall be deem™d Tithables.”)

In other words, Beaufort would’ve been seen as a point of weakness in the colony. Spanish attacks weren’t launched on the more populous areas.
Since the report said, “they killed several people, burned some ships and small vessels, carried off some negroes and slaughtered a great number of cattle and hogs,” it’s entirely possible that the purpose of the attack was to either free or take slaves and generally create mayhem, weakening the town by destroying property.
North Carolina didn’t have any great ports like Charleston. The ports that did exist in the colony were critical to its success. By launching attacks at various points along the coast, the Spanish invaders were proving their allegiance to the King of Spain by attacking his enemies in the English colony and perhaps enjoying a bit of indirect revenge on the Carolinas where they, or their forebears, had originally been enslaved.
What became of the free blacks of Fort Mose and St. Augustine?
Most of the black population of Fort Mose and St. Augustine ended up accompanying their Spanish compatriots to Cuba after Florida was ceded to the British with the Peace of Paris in 1763. (Britain temporarily had control of Havana”for nearly one year from 1762 to 1763”until they agreed to give it back to Spain in exchange for East Florida. West Florida was already under British control.)
According to Berlin, while the the black population at St. Augustine and Fort Mose totaled about 3,000, only about a quarter of them were free. While the National Park Service has called Fort Mose a precursor site to the Underground Railroad, a full three-quarters”totaling over 2,000 souls”of the black inhabitants of this “free black settlement” were enslaved.
It’s even possible that the “negroes” taken during the raid on Beaufort were, themselves, brought into slavery in Florida.
Who were the men who fought off the Spanish marauders?
Thanks to the wonderful documentary work of Joel S. Russell, we have a great deal of Carteret County historical and genealogical information available online at his website. He has lists for four key dates involving Beaufort’s history with the Spanish invasion. The first, June 14, 1747, was when Spanish ships were out in the bay taking ships. The second, August 26, 1747, was the day the Spaniards took Beaufort. The third date, September 1, 1747, was when our expanded militia began to fight off the marauders. By the fourth date, September 10, the attack on Beaufort was over.
Private John Arthur
Private Thomas Austin Jr
Private Thomas Austin Sr (This is my 7th-great-grandfather!)
Sergeant George Bell
Private James Bell Jr
Private John Bell
Private Newell Bell
Private Ross Bell
Private William Bowen
Private John Brown
Private William Burn
Private Cornel Canaday
Private Richard Canaday
Sergeant Thomas Canaday
Private Daniel Catholick
Private Ephraim Chadwick
Captain Charles Cogdell
Private George Cogdell
Private John Cogdell
Ensign Richard Cogdell
Private William Cole
Private Joseph Davis
Private William Dennis
Private Daniel Everitt
Private Joseph Fulford
Private Joseph Fulford Jr
Lieutenant Edward Fuller
Private Richard Gabriel
Private Dederick Gibble
Private Thomas Gillikin
Private Thomas Gillikin Jr
Private Benjamin Guthrie
Private Benjamin Hancock
Private Nathaniel Hancock
Private David Hicks
Private Samuel Howland
Private Ambrose Jones
Private David Lewis
Private Thomas Love
Private John McDowell
Private Jobe Meders
Private Timothy Merryhew
Private Joshua Nash
Private Samuel Negus
Private George Neithercott
Private Elias Nelson
Private John Nelson
Private William Owen
Private Nicholas Pacquinett
Private Isaac Parker
Private Peter Piver
Private Robert Polk
Private Robert Potts
Private Laughlin Quin
Rgt. Clerk George Read
Private Daniel Rees
Private John Roberts
Private William Roberts
Private Daniel Ross
Ensign John Shackleford
Private John Shackleford
Private David Shepard
Private Edward Shepard
Private Cornelius Simpson
Private Edward Simpson
Private John Simpson
Private Joshua Simpson
Private Benjamin Small (and son)
Private William Taylor
Private Richard Thompson
Private Resolve Waldron
Major Enoch Ward
Private Richard Ward
Private Valentine Ward
Private Jonas Weeks
Private Lewis Welsh
Private Maddock Wharton
Private Samuel Whitehurst
Private John Williamson
Private Richard Williamson
Sergeant John Williston
Private John Williston
Private Thomas Williston
Private James Woodland

The Annual Beaufort Pirate Invasion
Beautiful historic Beaufort, NC is a town that loves its history ” both real and imagined ” and in 1960, the first ever re-enactment of the Spanish invasion took place as a way of commemorating the victory of the Beaufort militia over the attacking Spaniards.
Beaufort artist, author, and historian extraordinaire, Mary Faith Warshaw, has a very thorough article on the history behind the original Spanish invasion as well as a summary of the re-enactments in 1960 and 1961.
These days, an event known as the Beaufort Pirate Invasion has taken things into a slightly different direction, bringing in Pirate re-enactors from all over the country to spend two days acting out scenes that are more reminiscent of the Golden Age of Piracy (or Pirates of the Caribbean) rather than the 1747 Spanish attack.
While the contemporary festivities aren’t strictly a re-enactment of what happened in that frightening summer of 1747, it’s still a wonderful event of great fun that will hopefully get folks interested in learning about the real history of the town and the region.
(This article was originally published April 14, 2015.)
Please Share: Old-fashioned Southern Recipes Wanted (from N.C., S.C., and Va.)

I hope you will share this post far and wide, as I’d like to get the word out about a very special project.
I’m putting together a cookbook inspired by the Adam Fletcher Adventure Series and would love to get some recipes submitted from families with roots in eastern North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia ” especially those from around the coastal regions.
While I have many old recipes that have been passed down in my own family, I think this book will be much better if it has a sampling of the flavors from many southeastern families.
If your recipe is chosen, you will of course be given credit in the cookbook and on this website, and you will receive a free print copy of the book when it is published.
I’m looking for all kinds of recipes ” as long as they’re authentic.
One thing to keep in mind, in the 18th century they didn’t have many of the ingredients we have today. (For instance, you won’t find recipes that include Campbell’s Cream of Celery soup or ingredients like baking soda and baking powder, because they didn’t have them, but I’m sure you already know that 😉 .)
Please e-mail your recipe, and a family story if you’d like to share one, to info [at] seaportpublishing.com or fill out this form. Be sure to include your name and hometown, as well as any information you’d like to include about the recipe’s history in your own family. I hope you’ll also include who taught you or provided you with the recipe. (For instance, was it your grandmother? A great aunt? Your mom? A dear lady from church?)
Submit as many recipes as you like. If your recipe(s) are chosen, you will be notified by e-mail and your mailing address will be requested so that a copy of the print edition of the cookbook can be sent to you as soon as its published.
From “The Universal Magazine of Knowledge and Pleasure” (1759): How to keep your ship and crew healthy

While doing book research, I came upon an interesting article that was reprinted in several different publications in the 18th century. It was only credited as being written by M. Duhamel from the Memoires de Trevoux.
I had no idea who M. Duhamel was, but after searching on Google, I learned his full name was Henri-Louise Duhamel du Monceaux (or Duhamel de Monceau), and he was a French physician, naval engineer, and botanist.
I found the article in the July 1759 edition of publication called The Universal Magazine of Knowledge and Pleasure. The title page revealed more about the book’s contents (Just bear with me on this… It‘s interesting. I‘ll get to the part about “Preserving the Health of Seamen” just a little further down the page.):
Containing News, Letters, Debates, Poetry, Musick, Biography, History, Geography, Voyages, Criticism, Translations, Philosophy, Mathematicks, Husbandry, Gardening, Cookery, Chemistry, Mechanicks, Trade, Navigation, Architecture, and other Arts and Sciences; Which may render it Instructive and Entertaining to Gentry Merchants FArmers And Tradesmen; To which occasionally will be added An Impartial Account of Books in several Languages and of the State of Learning in Europe: Also of the Stage New Operas Plays and Oratorios Vol XXV”. Published Monthly according to Act of Parliament By John Hinton at the King’s Arms in Newgate Street, London. Price Six Pence.”

The article by Mr. Duhamel gave a series of tips for best preserving the health of a ship’s crew, including:
- Avoid anchoring in areas surrounded by “mud, marshes, and sheltered from the wind”
- Good air is everything. “Nothing but malignant vapours, or putrid exhalations in the air, can occasion those dreadful contagions that lay waste cities, and sometimes intire [sic] provinces.”
- Make sure the air can circulate. Stagnate air promotes disease.
- None should be permitted on board except for “fresh and healthy sailors” who possess “all necessaries in linen and cloaths to keep themselves clean.
- Keep the ship clean. Sweep, scrub, “especially on the inside, all the parts of the ship, and particularly the post of the sick and the cattle-fold.”
- All should be washed, but only during the heat of day. Heat helps dry that which has been washed.
- Vent as much as possible the air below decks.
- Vinegar! Use vinegar! Vapour of vinegar can be used, vinegar can be splashed on things, even just inhaling the “vapour” of vinegar can have healthful effects.
- The burning of sulfur can also be helpful, the vapours of which can be cleansing.
- “[T]he hold, where the air is more corrupt than in any other part of the ship, should never be the lodgment of the sick, except in the time of an engagement. He assigns them a place where there are no hatches from the hold nor the lower deck, because the air issuing from these places is almost always very unwholesome; and advises, in a particular manner, those that are in good health, to make no use of the wearing apparel and the hammocks of the sick, contagious maladies being chiefly communicated by cloathes.”

If you would like to read the full text of the article with Mr. Duhamel’s recommendations, I have transcribed it below.
An Account of M. DUHAMEL™s Method of preserving the Health of Seamen; from the Memoires de Trevoux.
WHENEVER we see the name of M. Duhanel prefixed to a book, we may be assured, that it is the fruit of the most ardent zeal for the advancement of useful arts, and the good of mankind. Such is his treatise on the Methods for preserving the Health of seafaring Men. It is a summary of what experience discovered to him as most advantageous in that respect ; and we shall therefore extract the most interesting points, and analyse the practical details.
After several observations on the difference of places whose situation is more or less wholesome, M. Duhamel concludes in general, that rising grounds, and exposed to the wind, are the most wholesome; that those situate near tide, fresh or fair water, are not subject to the epidemies that infect ships; that the sea is not the cause of these epidemies; that seamen are more exposed to them, when they anchor in roads surrounded by mud, marshes, and sheltered from the wind; that, when their health obliges them to go on shore, they should be compelled to return aboard for the night, or, if this cannot be conveniently effected, should be kept at a distance from marshy grounds, and not permitted ever to incamp or to lie without good tents set up in dry, high, and open places.
To discover the particular causes of infection in ships, M. Duhamel lays down this general principle: That the different qualities of the air, the vapours that humect, the exhalations that penetrate it, influence to a great degree, the health of the animals that breathe it. Nothing but malignant vapours, or putrid exhalations in the air, can occasion those dreadful contagions that lay waste cities, and sometimes intire provinces. The more the air is debarred of a free circulation, the more it is susceptible of impressions from the causes that alter and corrupt it. Now all these inconveniencies concur to infect the air in ships, especially in the hold of a ship. It there becomes thick, and its thickness does not permit the perspiration of animals that breathe it, to discuss and dissipate it. Whence it happens, that the warmth of this confined air is more sensible than that of the exterior air, and its elasticity is prodigiously weakened. It has not, therefore, that degree of condensation, that freshness, that motion, which makes it favourable to respiration. This may be evinced from the incidents that happen to a bird shut up under a bell, where the air it breathes cannot be renewed. Between decks, and in the hold of ships, provisions contract heat, ferment, and send for exhalations; of which the volume, stench, and malignity are augmented by the like produced by the dung of animals, the smell of their wool, their respiration and transpiration, and the vapours exhaled from the putrid water in ships and in the sink, and even by the bitumen exalted from the sea.
If the ship™s crew are attacked by any sickness, the causes for infecting the air are still more multiplied. During voyages into cold, and much more into hot countries, seamen meet with new sources of disorders. The changes of air and climate are the more dangerous by their indiscretion in braving and even provoking their pernicious impressions. Lastly, salt aliments, though less subject to corrupt, yet, by being hard of digestion, bring on a multiplicity of diseases, especially the scurvy. These are the enemies M. Duhamel endeavors to destroy.
He first proposes precautions against their attacks by preventing them, persuaded, that it is always easier to guard against diseases, than to cure them; or that, if they cannot be intirely avoided, their violence may, in a great measure, be checked or abated.
These precautions are:
- œTo admit none aboard, but fresh and healthy sailors, and well provided with all necessaries in linen and cloaths to keep themselves clean. Sick, fatigued, ill-cloathed sailors are, in ships, a source of contagion.
- To clean frequently the sink; to sweep and scrub, especially on the inside, all the upper parts of the ship, and particularly the post of the sick and the cattle-fold. All should be carefully washed, but this ought to be only during the heat of the day, that it might dissipate the moisture before night. Cleanliness in the sailors, and keeping the ship from all filth, infection, and every thing productive of putrid exhalations and vapours, cannot be sufficiently attended to.
- To purify and renew, as much as possible, the air in the hold and under decks. For this purpose are used vent-holes, the wind-sleeve, bellows, and principally M. Hale™s ventilator.
Vent-holes are only apertures, through which the infected air may escape. Some observations are necessary to direct their use. Vapours are lighter than pure air, and their levity determines them to ascend through the vent given them. This is a general principle, that regulates the form and use of all the machines for reneweing the air of ships. Therefore the vents for introducing the pure air cannot be placed too low, nor those for letting out the infected vapours too high, and, if they were too narrow, the vapours would find in them a friction, which most obstruct, and could not be conquered by their levity. As to the other machines, M. Duhamel proposes some methods for making their play more easy, and their action more effectual.
Fire is another agent, which may serve the same purposes. It rarefies the ambient air, and the vapours it is loaded with. This rarefaction augments considerably their levity, and consequently accelerates their going out. Perfumes are also reckoned as a means for purifying the air of ships. The author alledges some examples of very troublesome and obstinate fainting fits, wherein the smell of vinegar alone produced the most salutary effects. This virtue he attributes less to the stimulating action of vinegar, than to the impression it produces on the air the sick persons breathe: For, says he, there are none but have found some pleasure in breathing the vapour of vinegar on days disposed for stormy weather; wherein, the air being less fit for respiration, one is obliged to fetch frequent and profound respirations; and thus it is sufficiently proved; that it is necessary to sprinkle good vinegar between the decks, and especially in the apartment of the sick. However, it seems probable that the effect is almost as transient as salutary; that is, that the salubrious quality communicated by vinegar to the air, is not so durable as the ease it procures the sick.
The vapours of burning sulphur, continues our author, hinder fermentation, and consequently corruption, even in the liquors that are most disposed to ferment, such as wine, bear, &c. It is also allowed that those vapours serve to disinfect the merchandise that come from countries suspected of contagion. Those Captains of ships are therefore to be commended, who from time to time burn priming powder steeped in vinegar between decks, or who perfume the decks with vinegar poured upon a red-hot ball. M. Duhamel prefers the aspersion of vinegar to its vapour, whereof the smoke is disagreeable, and may be hurtful, if too strong; for indeed the smell of vinegar is more grateful than breathing its vapour; andhe also counsels, in certain roads, when the weather is fair, to perfume with the vapour of sulphur the decks and bread-rooms. Care at the same time should be taken to guard against all accidnets of fire; and the ventilator of M. Hales, a bellows so powerful for pumping air, would not be less so, in diffusing the perfumes throughout all parts of the ship. If any disagreeable smell remained, it might be easily disippated by going about with a red hot iron ladle filled with aromatic drugs of little value, such as juniper-berries, and suchlike.
From all this practical doctrine M. Duhamel concludes, ˜That the hold, where the air is more corrupt than in any other part of the ship, should never be the lodgment of the sick, except in the time of an engagement. He assigns them a place where there are no hatches from the hold nor the lower deck, because the air issuing from these places is almost always very unwholesome; and advises, in a particular manner, those that are in good health, to make no use of the wearing apparel and the hammocks of the sick, contagious maladies being chiefly communicated by cloathes.™ In the time of a plague it has been observed, says he, that whole families have preserved themselves from the contagion, by shutting themselves up in their houses, though they received their provisions from infected persons, who sometimes fell dead whilst they conversed with them from their windows; whereas, at the same time, a single rag would communicate the plague. Of this, adds, he, I have a very decisive proof in the contagion that destroyed so great a number of cattle in France and elsewhere. One of our farmers prreserved all his cows, by keeping them shut up in a stable, and by hindering his domestics to go into infected stables, and those of his neighbours, whose cattle died, to come into his.
It is true, all these precautions for keeping ships from being infected are an addition to the seaman™s toil; but they need not be deemed such when found highly expedient for obtaining the great ends required from their service. M. Duhamel proposes likewise some substitutes to the ordinary food of seamen; but as the victualling of ships, particulary those of war, is provided for as the wisdom of a government thinks most proper we shall not here touch up that article.
When ships are arrived at their place of destination, M. Duhamel recommends that their stay should be as short as possible in rivers and muddy ports sheltered from the wind and known to be unwholesome. He also advises to avoid places wehre the sea is too calm; to abide only where there is good anchorage; to quit from time to time the road, and cruise about, in order to exercise the seamen; to place the land hospital far from vallies, marshes, and stagnant waters; to distribute preservatives against sickness to the soldiers, that repair at night to their tents; to furnish them with fresh provisions in fruits, pulse, fish, &c. This care will be particuarly necessary in the torrid zone: Cold countries require a peculiar treatment in cloathing, exercise, regimen &c. and sailors struck with cold should be kept from the use of spirituous liquors, till they are made to receive a certain degree of warmth.
To conclude, this work may, with good reason, be reputed an excellent manual for all sea-officers, who, no doubt, on perusing it, will confess the obligation they lie under to this learned Academician, for his zeal in promoting their interest, and preserving the lives of those committed to their charge.
Let Freedom Ring! Historical FAQ about Independence Day, the National Anthem, and July 4th celebrations
On today, July 4th, let’s examine a few bits and pieces of history related to America’s Independence and the patriotic displays that are still celebrated, nearly two and a half centuries after the birth of the United States.
Why do we celebrate July 4th, and what are we celebrating?
The Declaration of Independence, which stated the unanimous intent of the 13 American colonies to separate and stand apart from Great Britain as a new nation, was adopted by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776.
The 56 signers all agreed, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” and that, “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” They also agreed that, “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government.”
The decision to declare independence was not one entered into lightly by Congress. In fact, it was a unanimous decision that came about only after much agonizing, debate, and prayer. The Signers believed strongly that given circumstances with Great Britain, especially under the tyrannical leadership of King George III, that America’s only way forward was to institute a new government.

A list of dozens “repeated injuries and usurpations” by the “present King of Great Britain” (George III) was put forth as evidences of his “absolute Tyranny over these States.”
In the end, the Signers placed their circumstances in the hands of God, “the Supreme Judge of the world” (a phrase that echoes Abraham from Genesis 18:25, who calls the Lord, “Judge of all the earth”), and:
That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”
What’s the deal with fireworks and celebrations on the 4th of July?

In a letter to his wife, Abigail, Founding Father John Adams wrote:
The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America. I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.”
Wait… the second day of July?! Why the second?
Well, technically, the Continental Congress voted to adopt the Declaration of Independence on July 2, 1776. It was a momentous occasion. But it was not formally adopted until July 4, 1776, so that is the day we celebrate.
Apparently, John Adams always recognized July 2 as the day our nation declared its independence, going so far as forgo attending July 4th celebrations in his own means of protest.

In a fascinating bit of Founding Fathers trivia, it should be noted that John Adams (our second President) and Thomas Jefferson (our third President and man who was the primary author of the Declaration), both died on July 4, 1826 ” the 50th anniversary of the formal adoption of the document they championed.
The evolution of Independence Day
While celebrations occurred regularly on July 4th after the first Independence Day (including George Washington doubling the rum rations to his soldiers on that day in 1778), Massachusetts was the first state to officially adopt the day as a holiday in 1781, but nearly a hundred years passed before Congress declared it an official federal holiday.
After the War of 1812, which some might think of as the American Revolution, Part II, Independence Day celebrations became a much bigger deal.
The Star Spangled Banner – Our National Anthem
As Americans, we know to stand, face the flag, and put our hands over our hearts whenever our National Anthem is played, but why do we do it?

In short, it was because the song was written by Francis Scott Key, inspired by events he witnessed during a particularly pivotal battle in the War of 1812, the defense of Fort McHenry during the Battle of Baltimore on Sept. 13, 1814. He was relieved and overjoyed to see the fort’s enormous garrison flag, sewn by Mary Young Pickersgill, flying in the wee morning hours after the battle.
If you want to talk about fireworks, you should have seen the “bombs bursting in air” that he saw from the harbor on that fateful night.
This video does a great job of illustrating the events of that battle and how they came to inspire our National Anthem:
If you’d like to read more bits and pieces of the history that led up to the American Revolution, you can visit this page. More articles are being added to this site regularly, so be sure to subscribe to The Gazette for updates.
Place names in the Adam Fletcher Adventures

With three books out in the Adam Fletcher Adventure Series, I thought it would be a good idea to write a post about the place names used in the novels ” especially since I don’t always stick with the exact historical place names that were in use in the timeframe the books take place.
While this might seem heretical for historical fiction, I thought long and hard about this before deciding to use (for the most part) contemporary spellings of places like New Bern and Charleston. At the same time, I do alternate between the use of Port Beaufort and Beaufort.
There were many reasons why I chose to do this, but primarily, it’s to stick with a consistent spelling and not confuse readers.

Newbern or New Bern
I chose to use the spelling New Bern for the first book of the Adam Fletcher series. My family has been from Craven County for centuries so I have a great attachment to that place. The town was settled by Baron Christoph von Graffenried in 1710 as New Bern, named for the city of Berne, Switzerland.
In the following decades, the town’s name was written as Newbern. For a time during the mid-to-late-1800s, it was written about in newspapers as New Berne.
Then, in the 20th century, we see the original spelling, New Bern, become the norm again.
I decided to use the town name’s original spelling both because it is the original spelling of New Bern, and because the colonial capital is a popular tourist destination today. I want folks who’ve been to New Bern, or are planning to visit, to realize that the town in this book is the same place as the beautiful historic town in Craven County, North Carolina.

Port Beaufort or Beaufort
In the novels, you’ll find both names in use for Adam Fletcher’s home town.
Historically speaking, you’d often see Port Beaufort or Port of Beaufort on maps or in official writings about the town (such as in the Colonial Records), but in conversation, people would have most likely just said “Beaufort” unless they were specifically referring to the shipping business.
Charles Town or Charleston
Any look at old colonial-era maps will yield a variety of spellings of place names. Newspapers at the time also used various spellings of some places. In fact, I have seen maps and newspapers from the same period of history that use Charles Town and Charles-Town as the spelling of what we know today as Charleston.
According to Carolana.com:
From 1670 to 1783, the city was known as Charles Town then Charlestown. No “e” on the end. At the end of the American Revolution in 1783, the name was shortened to Charleston, which has been in use ever since.”
We can assume the pronunciation “Charleston” was likely in use in speech before 1783, but it’s anybody’s guess how long it may have been said like that. Since I’m unsure yet of just how far into the Revolutionary era Adam Fletcher’s adventures will go, I chose to use the 1783 spelling of the name of the famous South Carolina port city.

One more thing…
Regardless of how the names of these old towns are spelled, they are all wonderful places to visit. They are rich with history, timeless architecture, and beautiful waterfronts.
Also, be sure and read all of the Adam Fletcher series. I include all kinds of little known facts and real history in every novel ” the kinds of things you won’t often hear about from a tour guide.
The Real Blackbeard: Get ready to have everything you thought you knew turned on its head

In The Smuggler’s Gambit, one of the characters turns out to have a history with the pirate Blackbeard. As he recounts the experiences of his youth, he tells a different story than what legends and myths have had many of us believe over the years.
I credit my good friend, Kevin Duffus, author of The Last Days of Black Beard the Pirate and North Carolina Historian of the Year (2015), with his ground-breaking research on the most famous pirate who ever lived. If you have an hour, you’ll learn in this video that everything you thought you knew about Blackbeard is wrong.
Here are just a few highlights from the lecture:
- Blackbeard was not middle-aged when he was killed in his final battle with Lt. Maynard. In fact, he was probably only about 28 years old.
- None of the artistic impressions (woodcuts, portraits, etc.) of Blackbeard are based on any eyewitness accounts.
- Blackbeard’s real name wasn’t Edward Teach or Edward Thache, or anything of the sort.
- Blackbeard’s greatest treasure wasn’t gold. Do you know what it was? This video will tell you.
What’s Wrong with Black Beard? by Kevin P. Duffus (Video) from Virginia Historical Society on Vimeo.
(Originally published May 15, 2015.)
Massachusetts Circular Letter (Originally written by Samuel Adams and James Otis, Jr. and passed by the Massachusetts House of Representatives)
Circular letter from the Massachusetts House of Representatives to the provincial legislatures in America
Massachusetts. General Court
February 11, 1768
From The Colonial Records of North Carolina, Volume 07, Pages 686-689
[From MS. Records in Office of Secretary of State.]
Province of the Massachusetts-Bay, Feby 11th 1768.
Sir [to the Speaker of the House of Assembly.]
The House of Representatives of this Province have taken into their serious Consideration, the great Difficulties that must accrue to themselves and their constituents, by the Operation of the several Acts of Parliament imposing Duties and Taxes on the American Colonies.
As it is a Subject in which every Colony is deeply interested, they have no Reason to doubt but your Assembly is duly impressed with its Importance; and that such constitutional measures will be taken by them as are proper.
It seems to be necessary, that all possible Care should be taken that the Representations of the several Assemblies upon so delicate a Point should harmonize with each other: The House therefore hope that this Letter will be candidly considered in no other Light, than as expressing a Disposition freely to communicate their mind to a Sister Colony, upon a common Concern, in the same manner, as they would be glad to receive the Sentiments of you or any other House of Assembly on the Continent.
This House have humbly represented to the Ministry their own Sentiments, that his Majesty’s high Court of Parliament is the supreme legislative Power, over the whole Empire: That in all free States the Constitution is fixed; and as the supreme Legislative derives its Power and authority from the Constitution, it cannot overleap the Bounds of it without destroying its own Foundation: That the Constitution ascertains and limits both Sovereignty and Allegiance; and therefore his Majesty’s American Subjects who acknowledge themselves bound by the Ties of Allegiance, have an
equitable Claim to the full Enjoyment of the fundamental Rights of the British Constitution: That it is an essential unalterable Right in Nature, ingrafted into the British Constitution, as a fundamental Law, and ever held sacred and irrevocable, by the Subjects within the Realm, that what a man has honestly acquired is absolutely his own, which he may freely give, but cannot be taken from him without his Consent: That the American Subjects may therefore, exclusive of any Consideration of Charter Rights, with a decent Firmness adapted to the Character of Freemen and Subjects assert their natural constitutional Rights.
It is moreover their humble Opinion, which they express with the greatest Deference to the Wisdom of the Parliament, that the acts made there, imposing Duties on the People of this Province, with the sole and express Purpose of raising a Revenue, are Infringments of their natural Constitutional Rights, because as they are not represented in the British Parliament, his Majesty’s Commons in Britain by those Acts grant their Property without their Consent.
This House further are of Opinion, that their Constituents, considering their local Circumstances, cannot by any Possibility be represented in the Parliament; and that it will for ever be impracticable that they should be equally represented there, and consequently not at all; being separated by an Ocean of thousand Leagues: and that his Majesty’s royal Predecessors were graciously pleased for this Reason to form a subordinate Legislature here, that their Subjects might enjoy the unalienable Right of a Representation; and that considering the utter Impracticability of their being fully and equally represented in Parliament, and the great Expense that must unavoidably attend even a partial Representation there, this House think that a Taxation of their Constituents, even without their Consent, grievous as it is, would be preferable to any Representation that could be admitted for them there.
Upon these Principles, and also considering that were the Right in the Parliament ever so clear, yet for obvious Reasons it would be beyond the Rules of Equity that their Constituents should be taxed on the manufactures of Great Britain here, in addition to the Duties they pay for them in England, and other advantages, arising to Great Britain from the acts of Trade, this House have preferred a humble, dutiful and loyal Petition to our most gracious Sovereign, and made such Representations to his Majesty’s Ministry, as they apprehended would tend to obtain Redress.
They have also submitted it to Consideration, Whatever any People can be said to enjoy any Degree of Freedom, if the Crown in Addition to its undoubted Authority of constituting a Governor, should also appoint him such a Stipend, as it shall judge proper without the Consent of the People, and at their Expence; and whether while the Judges of the Land, and other civil officers in the Province hold not their Commission during good Behavior, their having Salaries appointed for them by the Crown, independent of the People, hath not a Tendency to subvert the Principles of Equity, and endanger the Happiness and Security of the Subject.
In addition to these measures, the House have wrote a Letter to their Agent Mr Deberdt, the Sentiments of which he is desired to lay before the Ministry, wherein they take notice of the Hardships of the Act for preventing Mutiny and Desertion, which requires the Governor and Council to provide enumerated articles for the King’s marching Troops, and the People to pay the Expence; and also of the Commission of the Gentlemen appointed Commissioners of the Customs to reside in America; which authorizes them to make as many appointments, as they think fit, and to pay the appointees what Terms they please; for whose mal conduct they are not accountable from whence it may happen that Officers of the Crown may be multiplied to such a Degree as to become dangerous to the Liberties of the People, by virtue of a Commission which doth not appear to this House to derive any such advantages to Trade, as many have been led to expect.
These are the Sentiments and Proceedings of this House and as they have too much Reason to believe that the authorities of the Colonies have represented them to his Majesty’s Government and the Parliament as factious, disloyal and having a desire to make themselves independent of the Mother Country, they have taken Occasion in the most humble Terms to assure his Majesty and his Ministers, that with regard to the People of this Province, and as they doubt not of all the Colonies, the Charge is unjust.
The House is fully satisfied, that your Assembly is too generous and enlarged in Sentiment, to believe, that this Letter proceeds from an Ambition of taking the Lead or dictating to the other Assemblies: They freely submit their opinion to the Judgment of others, and shall take it kind in your House to point out to them any Thing further which may be thought necessary.
This House cannot conclude without expressing their firm Confidence in the King, our common Head and Father, that the united and dutiful Supplications of his distressed American Subjects, will meet with his royal and favorable acceptance.
For further reading:
Massachusetts Circular Letter at NCPedia (https://www.ncpedia.org/massachusetts-circular-letter)
Correspondence of Governor William Tryon (http://digital.ncdcr.gov/cdm/ref/collection/p249901coll22/id/413146)
Samuel Adams, the Sugar Act, and Taxation (https://www.sarawhitford.com/samuel-adams-on-the-sugar-act-or-taxes-then-and-now/)
